TYRANNY IS UNCONSTITUTION

FEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCY

FEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCYFEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCYFEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCY

FEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCY

FEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCYFEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCYFEDERAL TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AGENCY
  • Home
  • Impact Cases
  • Appointments
  • About Us
  • More
    • Home
    • Impact Cases
    • Appointments
    • About Us
  • Home
  • Impact Cases
  • Appointments
  • About Us

Video

Check out this great video

Baltimore Maryland Police Corruption Cases

Precedential Decisions

The Commerce Clause

Civil Rights Act of 1875

Civil Rights Act of 1875

 

The Commerce Clause describes an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." 

Civil Rights Act of 1875

Civil Rights Act of 1875

Civil Rights Act of 1875


The Civil Rights Act of 1875 sometimes called the Enforcement Act or the Force Act, was a United States Federal law enacted during the  Reconstruction era in response to civil rights violations against  African Americas. The bill was passed by the 43rd United States Congress  and signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on March 1, 1875."

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896

Brown v. Board of Education 1954

Brown v. Board of Education 1954

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson#p-search" rel="">
Decided May 18, 1896Full case nameHomer A. Plessy v. John H. FergusonCitations163 U.S. 537 (more)16 S. Ct. 1138; 41 L. Ed. 256; 1896 U.S. LEXIS 3390Case historyPriorEx parte Plessy, 11 So. 948 (La. 1892)SubsequentNoneHoldingThe "separate but equal" provision of private services mandated by state government is constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.Court membership Chief Justice Melville Fuller  Associate Justices Stephen J. Field · John M. Harlan
Horace Gray · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · George Shiras Jr.
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham Case opinionsMajorityBrown, joined by Fuller, Field,Gray, Shiras, White, Peckham DissentHarlanBrewer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.Laws appliedU.S. Const. amend. XIV; 1890 La. Acts 152Overruled by(de facto) Brown v. Board of

Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), and subsequent rulings Wi[kisource has original text related to this article: Plessy v. Ferguson   "Plessy" redirects here. For similar names, see Plessis. Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 13, 1896
Decided May 18, 1896 Full case name Homer

A. Plessy v. John H. FergusonCitations163U.S. 537 (more)16 S. Ct. 1138; 41 L. Ed. 256;1896, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".The decision legitimized the many state laws re-establishing racial segregation that had been passed in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction Era (1865–1877). 

Brown v. Board of Education 1954

Brown v. Board of Education 1954

Brown v. Board of Education 1954

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that American state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9–0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," and therefore violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, the decision's 14 pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools, and the Court's second decision in Brown II only ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed

Success Stories

$150 Million Settlement

In a suit against Company, Inc., which was selling dangerous products, we won a record settlement for our clients, making sure that they are taken care of for life.

$1.5 Million Settlement

In a case of wrongful termination due to discrimination, we were able to get our client a settlement that helped them find a supportive work environment in which to continue their career.

$210 Million Settlement Stops Toxic Dumping

In our case against Terrible Company, LLC, we were able to get a settlement for our clients as well as protect them from any further damage to their communities from this toxic dumping program.

Copyright © 2019 Federal Transitional Justice Agency - All Rights Reserved.

Anti-Tyranny/Human Rights Organization

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept